Loading Live Market Data...
EXCLUSIVE

Esteghlal Khuzestan Claims Persepolis Illegally Signed Bifouma; Legal Standing Remains Unclear

Alireza Moharrami•2 min read•Nov 2, 2026•Updated: 1d ago•REF: OPA-261102-ZK7
Esteghlal Khuzestan Claims Persepolis Illegally Signed Bifouma; Legal Standing Remains Unclear
Photo: Tabnak
Listen to this story
AI Wire Voice•16 sections
Share Story

TEHRAN, Nov 2 (OPA) — Esteghlal Khuzestan’s CEO stated that the club initially attempted to resolve the matter through negotiations but failed. The club alleges that Persepolis engaged in unauthorized talks with Bifouma while the player was under a binding contract. Abolghasempour, a club representative, warned that if authorities find evidence of misconduct, Persepolis could face financial penalties or transfer bans, placing full responsibility on the club's leadership.

The core of the dispute stems from a FIFA Dispute Resolution Chamber ruling that deemed Bifouma’s contract termination with Esteghlal Khuzestan unjustified. However, the same ruling ordered Esteghlal Khuzestan to pay the player’s outstanding wages and bonuses. Because the financial judgment favored the player, it does not constitute a conviction against Persepolis.

Furthermore, an initial complaint filed by Esteghlal Khuzestan against Persepolis was dismissed due to unpaid legal fees. Bifouma subsequently filed his own claim with FIFA. Legal experts emphasize the distinction between the ruling on the player’s contract termination and the separate allegations regarding the conduct of his new club.

Reports suggest that Bifouma’s departure involved a tripartite agreement between Esteghlal Khuzestan, Persepolis, and the player. Allegations persist that specific financial obligations within this agreement remain unfulfilled, fueling the ongoing dispute. The existence of this agreement complicates claims of player poaching, as it implies Esteghlal Khuzestan was aware of the transfer process.

To date, no ruling has been issued to impose financial or transfer sanctions on Persepolis. Proving liability requires evidence that the club actively induced the player to breach his contract. While Esteghlal Khuzestan maintains the right to pursue its claims, the case remains a civil dispute over contractual obligations rather than a confirmed disciplinary violation.

Share Story
OPA Morning Intelligence

Subscribe to the Global Briefing

Receive our flagship executive dispatch every morning. Essential geopolitical analysis, financial benchmarks, and breaking world events delivered to your inbox.

AL

Alireza Moharrami

Verified Wire Contributor
OPA Middle East & Tehran Bureau

Senior correspondent covering geopolitics, regional developments, and strategic international affairs for OPA News (Optimum Public Affairs).

This dispatch adheres to the OPA Editorial Code of Ethics, independent multi-source verification, and factual accuracy guidelines.View Author Dossier & Archive

Reader Discussion

Leave a Comment

0 Comments

Loading comments...

EXCLUSIVEOriginal In-House Journalism & Investigation
AM
Alireza MoharramiStaff JournalistTehran, Iran

Staff Correspondent

CHIEF EDITOR

Editorial Oversight & Machine-Assisted Reporting

Human-in-the-Loop Verified

Editorial Oversight & Machine-Assisted Reporting: This dispatch was synthesized and localized via OPA automated intelligence under continuous human editorial supervision.

Original Reporting

This analysis was conducted and authored by OPA News editorial journalists.