Lebanese citizens express skepticism over potential shift in Israeli policy following upcoming elections
![A child stands next to the rubble of a building damaged in an Israeli attack on Qennarit, in southern Lebanon, on June 20, 2026 [Reuters]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.aljazeera.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F06%2F2026-06-20T190125Z_128840624_RC2PXLAFPVRR_RTRMADP_3_IRAN-CRISIS-LEBANON-SOUTH-AFTERMATH-1782010844.jpg%3Fresize%3D1920%252C1440&w=3840&q=75)
Key Takeaways
- Israel's general election is scheduled for October 27, 2026.
- A June 2026 survey found 87 percent of Lebanese consider Israel their enemy.
- The Dahiyeh Doctrine, associated with candidate Gadi Eisenkot, advocates for the use of disproportionate force.
OPA WIRE, Oct 24 (OPA) — Lebanese citizens are voicing widespread skepticism that the upcoming Israeli election on October 27 will alter the status quo in southern Lebanon. Many residents in Beirut view the potential ousting of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a domestic political shift that will not address the occupation of their territory or the systematic destruction of infrastructure in border villages. Fouad Debs, a Beirut-based lawyer, stated that any internal change in Israel is unlikely to produce meaningful policy shifts regarding Lebanon, characterizing potential adjustments as superficial gestures for international observers.
Karim Safieddine, a fellow at the Tahrir Institute for Middle East Policy, noted that no major Israeli political faction is campaigning on a platform of withdrawal from Lebanon. The Israeli military continues to occupy significant portions of the south, where demolition campaigns have displaced more than one million people. A June 2026 survey by the Lebanese American University found that while 54 percent of Lebanese support diplomatic engagement, 87 percent view Israel as an enemy, reflecting deep-seated distrust regardless of who holds power in Jerusalem.
The primary challenger to Netanyahu, Gadi Eisenkot of the Yashar party, is viewed with particular concern by many in Lebanon. As a former chief of staff and architect of the Dahiyeh Doctrine—a military strategy emphasizing disproportionate force—Eisenkot has criticized Netanyahu from the right, arguing for more aggressive military action against Hezbollah targets. Analysts suggest that the political discourse within Israel remains focused on security and domestic grievances rather than humanitarian concerns or the cessation of hostilities in neighboring states.
Lebanon currently remains in a state of strategic limbo following a US-brokered framework agreement signed in June, which has yet to result in a phased withdrawal of Israeli forces. With active fighting largely paused but the occupation becoming increasingly entrenched, observers are looking toward the United States midterm elections on November 3 as a potential indicator of future regional policy. Analysts suggest that the level of US political support will remain a primary factor in determining the scope of Israeli military operations in Lebanon and Syria.
Subscribe to the Global Briefing
Receive our flagship executive dispatch every morning. Essential geopolitical analysis, financial benchmarks, and breaking world events delivered to your inbox.
Mohammad Karamali
Verified Wire ContributorSenior correspondent covering geopolitics, regional developments, and strategic international affairs for OPA News (Optimum Public Affairs).
Related Stories & Follow-ups
Editorial WireReader Discussion
Leave a Comment
0 Comments
Owner
Editorial Oversight & Machine-Assisted Reporting
Human-in-the-Loop VerifiedEditorial Oversight & Machine-Assisted Reporting: This dispatch was synthesized and localized via OPA automated intelligence under continuous human editorial supervision.
Wire Source
This report was synthesized from Al Jazeera English under journalistic fair use.



